Irish Bond Litigation, 1919-1929, 1935
In the late 1910s and early 1920s, bonds were sold in the United States to support the Irish Republic in its struggle against British rule. Subscribers received a certificate that would be exchangeable for one gold bond of the Republic of Ireland after the international recognition of the Republic, i.e., independence. Suit was brought by the Irish Free State (after its creation by the British Parliament in 1921) to gain access to the bond funds amounting to approximately $6 million. Finerty acted as legal counsel for Eamon de Valera and Stephen O'Mara, who were trustees of the bond funds. The defendants' arguments were 1) that the Irish Republic had not been formally dissolved by the people of Ireland, and 2) that since the funds had been collected for a specific purpose--to aid the cause of the Irish Republic--turning the money over to the Free State would be a breach of trust.
The lawsuit dragged on for several years as a result of injunctions filed by both sides. The case was finally settled in 1927 when the New York Supreme Court decided that neither the Republic nor the Free State was entitled to the funds, but instead what was left after le gal fees should be returned to the subscribers. Finerty made two trips to Ireland in 1923 to take depositions for the case. These trips are fairly well documented in the series. The correspondence between Finerty and the other defense attorneys, Martin Conboy and Frank P. Walsh, is extensive, as is correspondence with other attorneys who were interested in the case. There are numerous contacts with Eamon de Valera, Sean T. O'Ceallaigh, Stephen O'Mara, and others in Ireland. As late as 1935 people tried to make claims against the bond funds.
Incoming and outgoing correspondence is interfiled in chronological order, along with clippings and some court documents. There are additional files of affidavits, briefs, and pleadings toward the end of the series.